Defenses
The common law provides an action for damages to persons injured as
a result of the negligence of another. This common law claim may furnish
the basis for redress to persons injured in an automobile accident, in
a gas explosion, by a defective product, by medical malpractice, or the
negligent conduct of an employee.
Elements of Negligence.
Lack of Usual Care. Negligence may be proved by showing
that the defendant failed to use ordinary care, or breached a recognized
legal duty to the plaintiff. A driver fails to look before entering an
intersection; a physician fails to follow accepted medical procedures;
a manufacturer uses dangerously weak materials. Sometimes negligence is
established by evidence of what others do in similar circumstances. Sometimes
negligence is established because the defendant violated a statute, regulation
or recognized engineering standard.
Direct Cause. The negligence actually caused the injury
or damage. Sometimes when an accident or injury occurs, negligence can
be proved, but the defendant claims that the injury would have happened
anyway, even if he had used ordinary care. For example, in a medical malpractice
case, the plaintiff might contend that the physician used the wrong medication.
The physician might defend claiming that, even if he had used correct medication,
the patient would have died anyway. Causation must be proved to establish
a claim for damages under a negligence theory.
Damages. The plaintiff must establish damages resulting
from the negligent conduct. The law recognizes a variety of damages, depending
upon the circumstances. Damages might include medical expenses, lost profits,
or lost wages. In addition, in cases involving personal injury, the plaintiff
may recover damages designed to compensate for pain and suffering.
Proximate Cause. The law of negligence requires that
the negligence must "proximately cause" the injury. Proximate cause is
a complex legal concept, designed to place reasonable limits on negligence
actions.
Defenses to Negligence. In addition to the elements
of a negligence claim, described above, the defendant may interpose certain
defenses. These defenses may seek to reduce the amount of the plaintiff's
claim, based upon "contributory negligence." Or they may seek to destroy
the claim altogether, as in the defense of assumption of the risk. Or they
may seek to shift the ultimate responsibility elsewhere. These defenses
will be discussed in another panel.
|